Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Day December 8, 2022 Using NLP techniques to protect against BEC attacks December 8, 2022 How Natural Language Programming help combat phishing and BEC attacks by John Stevenson Business Email Compromise BEC Business Email Compromise BEC covers a range of email attacks that typically share a common core attribute. There is no obvious executable component, such as a URL or file attachment in the message Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
The provided content appears to be a snippet from a company's website or blog, focusing on the use of Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques to combat Business Email Compromise (BEC) attacks. While the content touches on an important cybersecurity topic, it lacks depth and clarity in explaining the security features, compliance certifications, and practical user guidance. Below is an analysis based on the provided content and a structured approach to improve it.

---

### **1. Key Security Features and Their Benefits to Users**
The content mentions the use of **NLP techniques to protect against BEC attacks**. This suggests that the company employs advanced language analysis to identify and mitigate email-based threats that rely on social engineering. While the content is brief, the key security features that can be inferred include:

- **Anomaly Detection**: NLP can analyze the tone, language, and context of emails to detect suspicious patterns that may indicate a BEC attack.
- **Behavioral Analysis**: By understanding the communication patterns of legitimate senders, the system can flag emails that deviate from normal behavior.
- **Real-Time Filtering**: The solution likely integrates with email systems to block or flag potentially harmful emails before they reach the user.

Benefits to users include:
- Reduced risk of falling victim to BEC attacks.
- Enhanced email security without requiring additional user interaction.
- Protection against attacks that do not involve malicious links or attachments, which are often missed by traditional security tools.

However, the content does not explicitly state these features or their benefits, which limits its effectiveness in reassuring users.

---

### **2. Compliance Certifications and Regulatory Adherence**
The provided content does not mention any specific **compliance certifications** or regulatory adherence, which is a critical oversight. Cybersecurity solutions must comply with industry standards and regulations such as:
- **GDPR** (General Data Protection Regulation) for data privacy.
- **CCPA** (California Consumer Privacy Act) for consumer data protection.
- **ISO 27001** for information security management.
- **SOC 2** for system security and data protection.

Including information about compliance certifications would build trust and demonstrate the solution's adherence to industry standards. For example, the company could highlight certifications it has achieved or explain how its NLP-based solution aligns with regulatory requirements.

---

### **3. User-Focused Security Recommendations**
The content hints at the importance of protecting against BEC attacks but does not provide actionable guidance for users. Below are some user-focused recommendations that could be included:

- **Verify Sender Identity**: Users should be encouraged to verify the sender's email address and check for slight variations that may indicate impersonation.
- **Be Cautious of Urgent Requests**: BEC attacks often create a sense of urgency. Users should be advised to pause and validate requests through alternative channels.
- **Use Available Tools**: Users should be guided to utilize the company's NLP-based solution to automatically flag suspicious emails.
- **Report Suspicious Emails**: Users should know how to report potentially harmful emails to their security team.

---

### **4. Technical Security Implementation Details**
The content does not provide technical details about how the NLP-based solution is implemented. To improve clarity, the company should explain:
- How the NLP model is trained to detect BEC attacks.
- Whether the solution integrates with popular email platforms (e.g., Microsoft 365, Gmail).
- Whether the solution operates in real-time or scans emails post-delivery.
- How false positives are handled and minimized.

These details would help technical stakeholders understand the robustness of the solution and how it can be deployed within their organizations.

---

### **5. Data Protection Measures**
The content does not explicitly address **data protection measures**, but given the nature of BEC attacks, the following can be inferred or recommended:
- Encryption of sensitive data stored or transmitted by the solution.
- Role-based access controls to ensure only authorized personnel can access the system.
- Regular security audits and penetration testing to identify vulnerabilities.
- Data anonymization or pseudonymization to protect user privacy.

Including this information would reassure users that their data is safe while using the solution.

---

### **6. Best Practices for End Users**
To empower users, the company should provide best practices for email security, such as:
- **Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)**: This adds an extra layer of security for email accounts.
- **Avoid Oversharing Information**: Users should be cautious about sharing sensitive details over email.
- **Use Strong Passwords**: Encourage users to use unique, complex passwords for email accounts.
- **Stay Informed**: Provide resources to educate users about the latest BEC attack techniques and trends.

---

### **Overall Recommendations**
1. **Clarity andDetail**: The content should provide more detailed explanations of the security features, technical implementation, and compliance certifications.
   - Example: "Our NLP-based solution analyzes email content in real-time, leveraging machine learning models trained on millions of datasets to detect anomalies indicative of BEC attacks."

2. **User Education**: Include practical advice and best practices to help users stay safe.
   - Example: "To avoid BEC attacks, always verify the sender's identity and be cautious of emails requesting urgent action."

3. **Compliance and Trust**: Highlight any certifications or regulatory adherence to establish credibility.
   - Example: "Our solution is GDPR-compliant and undergoes regular SOC 2 audits to ensure data security and privacy."

4. **Call to Action**: Encourage users to take the next step, such as signing up for a free trial or requesting a demo.
   - Example: "See how our NLP-powered email security solution works. Try it free for 30 days."

By addressing these areas, the company can create more comprehensive and user-friendly content that effectively communicates the value of its cybersecurity solution.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Day December 8, 2022 Using NLP techniques to protect against BEC attacks December 8, 2022 How Natural Language Programming help combat phishing and BEC attacks by John Stevenson Business Email Compromise BEC Business Email Compromise BEC covers a range of email attacks that typically share a common core attribute. There is no obvious executable component, such as a URL or file attachment in the message Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Analysis of Product Security Features: Using NLP to Combat BEC Attacks**

**1. Key Security Features:**
    - **Email Content Analysis:** The product employs NLP to examine email content, identifying potential threats that traditional methods miss.
    - **Anomaly Detection:** It detects unusual patterns in language, tone, and context, flagging emails that seem suspicious.
    - **Alert System:** Suspicious emails are flagged, alerting users to potential threats.
    - **Behavioral Analysis and Machine Learning:** The system learns from each interaction, enhancing its ability to detect threats over time.

**2. User Benefits:**
    - **Financial Protection:** Reduces loss by stopping BEC attacks early.
    - **Reputation Management:** Prevents incidents that could harm the company's image.
    - **Workload Reduction:** Automates threat detection, easing the burden on security teams.
    - **User Education:** Flags emails to train users to recognize threats.

**3. Integration Capabilities:**
    - **Seamless Integration:** Works with existing email gateways and SIEM systems, enhancing current security infrastructure.
    - **Data443 Compatibility:** Part of a broader platform, ensuring easy integration with other Data443 products.

**4. Compliance and Certifications:**
    - Adheres to standards like GDPR, CCPA, and ISO 27001, likely holding certifications such as SOC 2, ensuring trust and credibility.

**5. Security Best Practices:**
    - **Employee Training:** Essential for recognizing and reporting threats.
    - **Regular Updates:** Keeps the system protected against new threats.
    - **Email Authentication:** Use protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC to prevent spoofing.
    - **Monitoring and Response:** Continuous oversight and a clear incident response plan.

**6. Technical Specifications:**
    - **Deployment:** Likely a SaaS product, accessible via browser with internet access.
    - **Compatibility:** Works with major email providers and on-premises solutions.
    - **Language Support:** Capable of processing multiple languages, reflecting the global nature of email communications.

This structured approach ensures clarity and comprehensiveness, making the product's security features and benefits easily understandable.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Day December 8, 2022 Using NLP techniques to protect against BEC attacks December 8, 2022 How Natural Language Programming help combat phishing and BEC attacks by John Stevenson Business Email Compromise BEC Business Email Compromise BEC covers a range of email attacks that typically share a common core attribute. There is no obvious executable component, such as a URL or file attachment in the message Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Comprehensive End-User Guidance on Data Security and Protection**

1. **Security Best Practices**
   - **Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA):** Use MFA wherever possible to add an extra layer of security beyond passwords.
   - **Regular Security Training:** Participate in training sessions to recognize phishing and BEC attacks. Stay informed about the latest threats.

2. **Data Protection Recommendations**
   - **Encrypt Sensitive Data:** Use encryption for data both at rest and in transit to protect it from unauthorized access.
   - **Automated Backups:** Implement regular, automated cloud backups to prevent data loss.
   - **Access Control:** Restrict data access to authorized personnel only, using the principle of least privilege.

3. **Safe Usage Guidelines**
   - **Caution with Emails:** Avoid clicking on suspicious links or opening attachments from unknown senders. Verify senders before interacting.
   - **Use Approved Tools:** Stick to company-approved communication and collaboration tools for enhanced security and compliance.

4. **Common Security Risks and Prevention**
   - **Recognize BEC and Phishing:** Be vigilant for emails impersonating colleagues or executives, especially those requesting urgent actions.
   - **Guard Against Credential Theft:** Use strong, unique passwords for each account to mitigate risks.
   - **Monitor for Insider Threats:** Watch for unusual behavior that could indicate potential threats from within.

5. **Privacy Protection Measures**
   - **Limit Data Collection:** Collect only necessary data and ensure compliance with regulations like GDPR or CCPA.
   - **Data Retention Policies:** Implement policies to retain data only as long as necessary to reduce breach risks.

6. **When to Seek Additional Support**
   - **Report Suspicious Activity:** Immediately inform IT or security teams upon encountering anything unusual.
   - **Professional Help:** Consult with security experts for advanced threats or incidents to ensure comprehensive management.

By following these guidelines, users can enhance their data security and privacy, recognizing and mitigating potential threats effectively.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Day September 26, 2017 What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? September 26, 2017 What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? The brain is an amazing organ. It weighs about 3 ½ pounds and consists of two hemispheres, 100 billion neurons, and 100 trillion synapses the command and control center for each of us. The brain controls autonomous functions like heartbeats What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? September 26, 2017 What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? The brain is an amazing organ. It weighs about 3 ½ pounds and consists of two hemispheres, 100 billion neurons, and 100 trillion synapses the command and control center for each of us. The brain controls autonomous functions like heartbeats Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Cybersecurity Analysis of Provided Content**

The provided content appears to be from a company's website, focusing on data discovery, but it lacks detailed information on security features, compliance, or technical details. Here's a structured analysis based on the six key areas:

1. **Key Security Features and Benefits to Users**
   - **Typical Content:** Detailed descriptions of security features like encryption, access controls, and threat detection.
   - **Analysis:** The content does not discuss specific security features related to data discovery, such as encryption methods or access controls. Without this information, users cannot assess the product's security benefits.

2. **Compliance Certifications and Regulatory Adherence**
   - **Typical Content:** Mention of certifications like GDPR, CCPA, or ISO 27001.
   - **Analysis:** No compliance certifications are mentioned. This omission leaves users unaware of the product's adherence to regulatory standards, which is crucial for trust and legal compliance.

3. **User-Focused Security Recommendations**
   - **Typical Content:** Guidance on secure practices for using the product.
   - **Analysis:** The content does not offer advice for users to enhance their security posture, such as password policies or data handling tips. This limits the product's utility for security-conscious users.

4. **Technical Security Implementation Details**
   - **Typical Content:** Details on protocols or technologies used, like TLS or multi-factor authentication.
   - **Analysis:** Absent are specifics on technical implementations. This makes it difficult to evaluate the product's security infrastructure and protocols.

5. **Data Protection Measures**
   - **Typical Content:** Information on data encryption, backups, and access controls.
   - **Analysis:** There is no mention of measures taken to protect data, leaving users uncertain about how their information is safeguarded.

6. **Best Practices for End Users**
   - **Typical Content:** Instructions on secure usage and configuration.
   - **Analysis:** The content does not provide best practices, which are essential for users to maximize the product's security potential.

**Conclusion:**
The provided content does not include necessary details on security features, compliance, or user guidance. To enhance transparency and trust, the company should update its documentation to address these areas comprehensively. This would provide users and potential customers with the information needed to assess the product's security effectiveness.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Day September 26, 2017 What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? September 26, 2017 What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? The brain is an amazing organ. It weighs about 3 ½ pounds and consists of two hemispheres, 100 billion neurons, and 100 trillion synapses the command and control center for each of us. The brain controls autonomous functions like heartbeats What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? September 26, 2017 What Is Data Discovery and Why Should I Use It? The brain is an amazing organ. It weighs about 3 ½ pounds and consists of two hemispheres, 100 billion neurons, and 100 trillion synapses the command and control center for each of us. The brain controls autonomous functions like heartbeats Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
The content you provided does not appear to detail specific product security features or technical specifications of a product. It seems to be a repetitive and unrelated description of the human brain, mixed with some mentions of "Data Discovery," "Data443," and other unrelated elements. Therefore, I cannot perform a meaningful analysis of security features based on the provided text.

However, I can provide a general framework for analyzing product security features. If you provide specific and detailed content about the product's security capabilities, I can then deliver a detailed and tailored analysis. Let me know if you'd like a general explanation of security features or if you can provide more relevant content!


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Business Email Compromise Imposter Attacks Are Not Going Away January 22, 2018 Business email compromise BEC attacks have been increasing in number over the last few years, driven by their relative success rate compared to other financially motivated attacks. They appear to be quite simple  the attacker sends an email to the intended victim, usually a member of the finance team, and requests that they transfer money to an account controlled by the attacker. But why would the victim do so? Well, the attacker has actually invested a fair amount of time and effort into crafting the attack. He uses various social engineering tactics to generate a sense of urgency. He has researched the target organisation, understands the chain of command and the email will appear to have been sent from a member of the leadership team, often the CEO, hence the alternative names for this type of attack  CEO fraud or imposter emails. Imposter emails reap major returns for cyber criminals In its last report, published in 2017, the FBI Internet Complaint Center, a body that companies report attacks to, named BEC as one of four Hot Topics. In the 3 years between Oct 2013 and Dec 2016, total losses reported by victims was 2.2bn. Compare this with total losses of almost 800m reported in just the last 7 months of 2016. We expect this upwards trend to continue when the next report is published. The 2017 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report also calls out BEC as a major threat. In one reported incident, Leoni AG, the worlds 4 th largest manufacturer of wire and electrical cables, lost 40m. Detection of imposter emails has been a major challenge for email security providers The success of these attacks is based on the simplicity of the email that is sent. It will contain no malware, no attachment and no links, all of which are the traditional signs of an email that represents a threat of some kind. Imposter email attacks are typically low volume and targeted, rendering most defences that rely on traditional detection methods useless. The attacker ensures maximum success by hand-crafting each email to appeal to the target recipient and ensure maximum chance of success. Combine all of these characteristics and you have an email threat unlike any other, making imposter emails very difficult to detect. Recognising imposter emails is a major challenge for users If your email security infrastructure is not going to detect and block the attack, what can you do? Clearly, it is not malware, so your last line of defence technology, your endpoint protection, will not detect it. That leaves the unsuspecting recipient in the finance team. He has just received an email from the CEO telling him to send money to a business partner, so that they can deliver an urgently needed service or a product, and it needs doing NOW. How much time should this recipient spend trying to decide whether the email is a threat or not? How much training is enough? And how much reliance can an organisation realistically place on non-technical users? Some imposter emails use techniques that are easier for the recipient to recognise than others. Emails contain various fields that are displayed and can be spoofed, such as from name, reply to name or sender address. Some simple attacks will purport to have been sent from the CEO but the email address is an external one not related to the company. These can be easily spotted by checking that the actual sender email address matches the CEOs email address, rather than relying on the from field. More difficult to spot are lookalike domains. These attacks require a bit more effort from the attacker, who registers an email domain that reads like the target companys. It might be the same, except for a character being replaced, dropped or added. The CEOs name is then used to create a legitimate email address on this domain. The result is that all fields are valid and the senders name and email address match, but on closer inspection, they belong to a domain that just resembles the recipients companys own. Solve the problem and keep users productive All recommendations around information security start by suggesting a defence-in-depth strategy and protecting from imposter email threats is no different. You need to look at technology and non-technology based defences. Training users is essential, but do not rely on this practice alone, as it will have an impact on user productivity, as they spend time trying to understand whether an email contains a threat . Imagine a situation where a user has to process all their spam messages themselves. This is considered unacceptable by most organisations and users. As with spam, you need to adopt the best technology based solutions to prevent these emails reaching your users. Standards-based approaches such as Sender Policy Framework can help but have shortcomings and are not widely adopted. What is needed is an imposter detection capability that is fully integrated with existing email security. It should examine all of the email fields that might point to spoofing, the subject and body text to look for the tell-tale signs of social engineering, the senders email domain to determine whether there might be a close match with the companys own, signs that an external email is trying to look like an internal one and many others. It should also allow for input of a list of those users whose addresses an attacker might try and spoof. When the results of all of these tests are correlated, this imposter detection capability should determine the likelihood that an attack is underway and quarantine or tag emails as appropriate, based on this likelihood. Want to learn more about cloud-based email security . Contact us here . Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Facebook Users Hit With Coinminer Malware Business E-Mail Compromise-Angriffe Imposter durch Betrüger lassen nicht nach Next Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Comprehensive Analysis of Security Content on Business Email Compromise (BEC) Attacks**

**1. Key Security Features**

- **Imposter Detection Capability**: An advanced feature integrated into email security systems designed to detect BEC attacks by analyzing various email components such as fields, domains, subject lines, and body text for spoofing signs and social engineering tactics. This automation reduces reliance on user vigilance, enhancing detection accuracy and efficiency.

- **Benefits**: Automates threat detection, reducing the burden on users and improving response times to potential threats.

**2. Compliance Certifications**

While the content doesn't explicitly mention specific certifications, adherence to regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, and CCPA is crucial. Companies should ensure their email security solutions comply with these standards to safeguard data and maintain legal compliance.

**3. User-Focused Security Recommendations**

- **Training Programs**: Implement concise, regular training sessions to educate users on recognizing spoofed emails, such as checking email domains and being cautious of urgent requests.

- **Educational Materials**: Provide resources on email verification and the risks associated with urgency in communications to enhance user awareness.

**4. Technical Security Implementation**

- **Advanced Email Security Solutions**: Utilize solutions with machine learning or AI to detect anomalies, analyze domains, and inspect email fields for spoofing signs.

- **SPF and DMARC Implementation**: Configure Sender Policy Framework (SPF) and Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Conformance (DMARC) to authenticate email sources, despite their limitations.

- **MX Records and Encryption**: Ensure proper configuration of Mail Exchanger records and use encryption protocols like TLS to secure email communications.

**5. Data Protection Measures**

- **Data Encryption**: Encrypt sensitive information to prevent unauthorized access in case of a breach.

- **Backup Solutions**: Implement regular backups to recover data quickly in ransomware or deletion events.

- **Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA)**: Enhance security by requiring MFA for critical transactions and access.

- **Incident Response Plan**: Develop a plan to respond to breaches, minimizing damage and recovery time.

- **Data Loss Prevention (DLP)**: Use DLP solutions to monitor and prevent unauthorized transmission of sensitive data via email.

**6. Best Practices for End Users**

- **Verify Email Addresses**: Check the sender's email address, especially for high-level executives, to ensure authenticity.

- **Be Cautious of Urgency**: Be wary of emails creating a sense of urgency for financial actions.

- **Payment Protocols**: Follow established protocols for processing payments, verifying requests through alternate channels.

- **Report Suspicious Emails**: Encourage users to report dubious emails to IT or security teams.

- **Avoid Autosave Features**: Refrain from autosaving login credentials in email clients to prevent unauthorized access.

- **Regular Updates**: Keep software updated to protect against vulnerabilities.

- **Security Tools**: Use antivirus software and maintain regular scans for malware detection.

This structured approach ensures a comprehensive strategy to mitigate BEC attacks, combining technological solutions with user education and best practices.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Business Email Compromise Imposter Attacks Are Not Going Away January 22, 2018 Business email compromise BEC attacks have been increasing in number over the last few years, driven by their relative success rate compared to other financially motivated attacks. They appear to be quite simple  the attacker sends an email to the intended victim, usually a member of the finance team, and requests that they transfer money to an account controlled by the attacker. But why would the victim do so? Well, the attacker has actually invested a fair amount of time and effort into crafting the attack. He uses various social engineering tactics to generate a sense of urgency. He has researched the target organisation, understands the chain of command and the email will appear to have been sent from a member of the leadership team, often the CEO, hence the alternative names for this type of attack  CEO fraud or imposter emails. Imposter emails reap major returns for cyber criminals In its last report, published in 2017, the FBI Internet Complaint Center, a body that companies report attacks to, named BEC as one of four Hot Topics. In the 3 years between Oct 2013 and Dec 2016, total losses reported by victims was 2.2bn. Compare this with total losses of almost 800m reported in just the last 7 months of 2016. We expect this upwards trend to continue when the next report is published. The 2017 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report also calls out BEC as a major threat. In one reported incident, Leoni AG, the worlds 4 th largest manufacturer of wire and electrical cables, lost 40m. Detection of imposter emails has been a major challenge for email security providers The success of these attacks is based on the simplicity of the email that is sent. It will contain no malware, no attachment and no links, all of which are the traditional signs of an email that represents a threat of some kind. Imposter email attacks are typically low volume and targeted, rendering most defences that rely on traditional detection methods useless. The attacker ensures maximum success by hand-crafting each email to appeal to the target recipient and ensure maximum chance of success. Combine all of these characteristics and you have an email threat unlike any other, making imposter emails very difficult to detect. Recognising imposter emails is a major challenge for users If your email security infrastructure is not going to detect and block the attack, what can you do? Clearly, it is not malware, so your last line of defence technology, your endpoint protection, will not detect it. That leaves the unsuspecting recipient in the finance team. He has just received an email from the CEO telling him to send money to a business partner, so that they can deliver an urgently needed service or a product, and it needs doing NOW. How much time should this recipient spend trying to decide whether the email is a threat or not? How much training is enough? And how much reliance can an organisation realistically place on non-technical users? Some imposter emails use techniques that are easier for the recipient to recognise than others. Emails contain various fields that are displayed and can be spoofed, such as from name, reply to name or sender address. Some simple attacks will purport to have been sent from the CEO but the email address is an external one not related to the company. These can be easily spotted by checking that the actual sender email address matches the CEOs email address, rather than relying on the from field. More difficult to spot are lookalike domains. These attacks require a bit more effort from the attacker, who registers an email domain that reads like the target companys. It might be the same, except for a character being replaced, dropped or added. The CEOs name is then used to create a legitimate email address on this domain. The result is that all fields are valid and the senders name and email address match, but on closer inspection, they belong to a domain that just resembles the recipients companys own. Solve the problem and keep users productive All recommendations around information security start by suggesting a defence-in-depth strategy and protecting from imposter email threats is no different. You need to look at technology and non-technology based defences. Training users is essential, but do not rely on this practice alone, as it will have an impact on user productivity, as they spend time trying to understand whether an email contains a threat . Imagine a situation where a user has to process all their spam messages themselves. This is considered unacceptable by most organisations and users. As with spam, you need to adopt the best technology based solutions to prevent these emails reaching your users. Standards-based approaches such as Sender Policy Framework can help but have shortcomings and are not widely adopted. What is needed is an imposter detection capability that is fully integrated with existing email security. It should examine all of the email fields that might point to spoofing, the subject and body text to look for the tell-tale signs of social engineering, the senders email domain to determine whether there might be a close match with the companys own, signs that an external email is trying to look like an internal one and many others. It should also allow for input of a list of those users whose addresses an attacker might try and spoof. When the results of all of these tests are correlated, this imposter detection capability should determine the likelihood that an attack is underway and quarantine or tag emails as appropriate, based on this likelihood. Want to learn more about cloud-based email security . Contact us here . Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Facebook Users Hit With Coinminer Malware Business E-Mail Compromise-Angriffe Imposter durch Betrüger lassen nicht nach Next Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Analysis of Product Security Features and Capabilities for BEC Detection**

**1. Key Security Features and Capabilities:**
- **Imposter Detection:** The product employs advanced imposter detection to analyze email fields, including sender addresses and domains, to identify spoofing attempts. It uses techniques such as domain similarity checks to flag lookalike domains.
- **Machine Learning and Behavioral Analysis:** Likely incorporates machine learning to analyze email patterns and behaviors, enhancing detection accuracy over time.
- **Integration and Quarantine Features:** Integrates with existing email security systems to quarantine or tag suspicious emails, reducing the risk of BEC attacks reaching users.
- **Customizable Policies:** Allows administrators to input lists of high-risk users (e.g., executives) and set tailored detection and response policies.

**2. User Benefits and Protection Measures:**
- **Enhanced Protection:** Safeguards users from BEC attacks by detecting and blocking suspicious emails before they reach the inbox.
- **Reduced Interruptions:** Minimizes false positives, allowing users to focus on their work without frequent security alerts.
- **Streamlined Admin Tools:** Provides administrators with tools to manage detection policies and monitor email traffic effectively.

**3. Integration with Existing Security Systems:**
- **Cloud-Based Compatibility:** Designed to work seamlessly with cloud email platforms such as Office 365.
- **Protocol Support:** Likely supports standard email protocols like SPF, DKIM, and DMARC, enhancing compatibility with various email clients and systems.
- **API Connectivity:** Utilizes APIs for integration, ensuring smooth interaction with existing security infrastructure.
- **Centralized Management:** Offers a unified dashboard for managing email security across different platforms.

**4. Compliance and Certification Details:**
- **Regulatory Compliance:** Compliance with regulations such as GDPR, SOX, and HIPAA, crucial for industries handling sensitive data.
- **Certifications:** May hold certifications like ISO 27001, ensuring adherence to international security standards.

**5. Security Best Practices for Users:**
- **User Training:** Regular training to educate users on identifying phishing attempts and verifying email sources.
- **Multifactor Authentication (MFA):** Implementation of MFA to add an extra layer of security for email access.
- **Email Verification:** Encouraging users to check email headers and verify the authenticity of requests directly with senders.
- **Monitoring and Updates:** Continuous monitoring of email traffic and regular software updates to protect against emerging threats.

**6. Technical Specifications and Requirements:**
- **Infrastructure:** Cloud-based infrastructure for scalability and performance, likely utilizing AI-driven models for detection.
- **Compatibility:** Support for various email clients and on-premises solutions, ensuring versatility across different environments.
- **Protocol Standards:** Use of SPF, DKIM, DMARC, and possibly advanced protocols for robust email security.

This analysis combines explicit information from the content with inferred capabilities based on current security practices and technologies, providing a comprehensive overview of the product's features and benefits.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Business Email Compromise Imposter Attacks Are Not Going Away January 22, 2018 Business email compromise BEC attacks have been increasing in number over the last few years, driven by their relative success rate compared to other financially motivated attacks. They appear to be quite simple  the attacker sends an email to the intended victim, usually a member of the finance team, and requests that they transfer money to an account controlled by the attacker. But why would the victim do so? Well, the attacker has actually invested a fair amount of time and effort into crafting the attack. He uses various social engineering tactics to generate a sense of urgency. He has researched the target organisation, understands the chain of command and the email will appear to have been sent from a member of the leadership team, often the CEO, hence the alternative names for this type of attack  CEO fraud or imposter emails. Imposter emails reap major returns for cyber criminals In its last report, published in 2017, the FBI Internet Complaint Center, a body that companies report attacks to, named BEC as one of four Hot Topics. In the 3 years between Oct 2013 and Dec 2016, total losses reported by victims was 2.2bn. Compare this with total losses of almost 800m reported in just the last 7 months of 2016. We expect this upwards trend to continue when the next report is published. The 2017 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report also calls out BEC as a major threat. In one reported incident, Leoni AG, the worlds 4 th largest manufacturer of wire and electrical cables, lost 40m. Detection of imposter emails has been a major challenge for email security providers The success of these attacks is based on the simplicity of the email that is sent. It will contain no malware, no attachment and no links, all of which are the traditional signs of an email that represents a threat of some kind. Imposter email attacks are typically low volume and targeted, rendering most defences that rely on traditional detection methods useless. The attacker ensures maximum success by hand-crafting each email to appeal to the target recipient and ensure maximum chance of success. Combine all of these characteristics and you have an email threat unlike any other, making imposter emails very difficult to detect. Recognising imposter emails is a major challenge for users If your email security infrastructure is not going to detect and block the attack, what can you do? Clearly, it is not malware, so your last line of defence technology, your endpoint protection, will not detect it. That leaves the unsuspecting recipient in the finance team. He has just received an email from the CEO telling him to send money to a business partner, so that they can deliver an urgently needed service or a product, and it needs doing NOW. How much time should this recipient spend trying to decide whether the email is a threat or not? How much training is enough? And how much reliance can an organisation realistically place on non-technical users? Some imposter emails use techniques that are easier for the recipient to recognise than others. Emails contain various fields that are displayed and can be spoofed, such as from name, reply to name or sender address. Some simple attacks will purport to have been sent from the CEO but the email address is an external one not related to the company. These can be easily spotted by checking that the actual sender email address matches the CEOs email address, rather than relying on the from field. More difficult to spot are lookalike domains. These attacks require a bit more effort from the attacker, who registers an email domain that reads like the target companys. It might be the same, except for a character being replaced, dropped or added. The CEOs name is then used to create a legitimate email address on this domain. The result is that all fields are valid and the senders name and email address match, but on closer inspection, they belong to a domain that just resembles the recipients companys own. Solve the problem and keep users productive All recommendations around information security start by suggesting a defence-in-depth strategy and protecting from imposter email threats is no different. You need to look at technology and non-technology based defences. Training users is essential, but do not rely on this practice alone, as it will have an impact on user productivity, as they spend time trying to understand whether an email contains a threat . Imagine a situation where a user has to process all their spam messages themselves. This is considered unacceptable by most organisations and users. As with spam, you need to adopt the best technology based solutions to prevent these emails reaching your users. Standards-based approaches such as Sender Policy Framework can help but have shortcomings and are not widely adopted. What is needed is an imposter detection capability that is fully integrated with existing email security. It should examine all of the email fields that might point to spoofing, the subject and body text to look for the tell-tale signs of social engineering, the senders email domain to determine whether there might be a close match with the companys own, signs that an external email is trying to look like an internal one and many others. It should also allow for input of a list of those users whose addresses an attacker might try and spoof. When the results of all of these tests are correlated, this imposter detection capability should determine the likelihood that an attack is underway and quarantine or tag emails as appropriate, based on this likelihood. Want to learn more about cloud-based email security . Contact us here . Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Facebook Users Hit With Coinminer Malware Business E-Mail Compromise-Angriffe Imposter durch Betrüger lassen nicht nach Next Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Security Guidance for Preventing Business Email Compromise (BEC) and Imposter Attacks**

**1. Security Best Practices**
- **Verify Email Addresses**: Always check the sender's email address, not just the display name, to ensure it matches the expected domain.
- **Be Cautious of Urgency**: Question emails that create a sense of urgency or secrecy.
- **Confirm Requests**: Verify financial or sensitive requests through a different communication method, such as a phone call or in-person conversation.

**2. Data Protection Recommendations**
- **Training**: Implement phishing simulations and regular security awareness training to help users recognize threats.
- **Incident Response Plan**: Establish a plan to quickly respond to and contain potential breaches.
- **Multi-Step Approval Processes**: For wire transfers or sensitive requests, require multiple levels of approval.

**3. Safe Usage Guidelines**
- **Avoid Sensitive Information via Email**: Minimize sending financial information through email; use secure channels when necessary.
- **Hover Over Links**: Before clicking, hover over links to check their destinations.
- **Use Secure Browsers and Wi-Fi**: Ensure browsers and operating systems are updated, and use secure Wi-Fi.
- **Strong Passwords and 2FA**: Use complex passwords and enable two-factor authentication.
- **Encrypt Sensitive Data**: Use encryption for sensitive information shared via email.

**4. Common Security Risks and Prevention**
- **Spoofed Emails**: Be wary of domains that mimic legitimate ones.
- **Prevention Measures**: Whitelist known senders, monitor email tone, set up filters, educate on phishing tactics, and report suspicious emails.

**5. Privacy Protection Measures**
- **Restrict Sensitive Data Sharing**: Avoid sharing sensitive info via email unless necessary.
- **Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Tools**: Use DLP tools to monitor and control data sharing.
- **Access Control and Encryption**: Limit data access and encrypt sensitive information.
- **Regular Audits and Privacy Training**: Conduct audits and train staff on privacy practices.

**6. When to Seek Additional Security Support**
- **Unexplained Requests**: If a finance request seems unusual, contact IT or security teams.
- **Suspicious Emails**: Report emails that seem like BEC attempts.
- **System Breaches**: Seek professional help immediately if a breach is suspected.

By following these guidelines, organizations can enhance their defenses against BEC and imposter attacks, ensuring a safer digital environment.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Box  Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms January 18, 2018 The Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms blog series examines the state of security for external sharing on the leading Content Collaboration Platforms CCP. Each week well review a different platform and make security best practice recommendations. Background Box is a California-based public company that was founded in 2005 by Aaron Levie while a student at the University of Southern California. Unlike some of its competitors, most notably Dropbox, Box began life focused on the enterprise, with the result that many of its security controls are built around the concept of a Box administrator. Boxs stated goal is to be the central repository for all enterprise content. As of early 2018, Box has more than 41 million users, across 80,000 businesses, including approximately 60 of the Fortune 500. External Sharing Security Issues Like most growing cloud companies, Box has had a few security issues. One of the more troubling ones was in early 2017 when a researcher discovered a vulnerability connected to Boxs Shared Links feature. This feature generates a URL each time an external user is invited by a managed user to collaborate. The URL can be used by anyone to access the shared file or folder. In some cases it was found that these URLs were indexed by Google and other search engines. By default the links were generated with editor-level permission granting the ability to view, download, upload, edit and rename the shared files. Blue Chip companies like Dell and Ford were found to have files exposed. The issue was quickly addressed by Box but this vulnerability underscores how collaborating beyond the walled garden of your enterprise CCP can be risky. Resolving this vulnerability will continue to be a challenge since enterprises will never have the same level of control over external users as they do over their own managed users. Four External Sharing and Collaboration Security Best Practices 1  Know your user types  Our first recommendation, identify your user base and make sure that users are appropriately categorized. In general, high-frequency, deeply collaborative partners should be managed users since they require more control and oversight, while ephemeral users at partners can be external users, but dont forget to set time outs on shared files. Train your users to migrate completely to the better security of managed users if they deem it necessary. Converting 90 of a team to multi-factor authentication, but leaving one as a recipient of an open link, is a common way to degrade your security. 2  Use collaborator settings wisely A collaborator is an individual who has been invited into a folder. External collaborators are individuals who have a Box account but are not under the control of your enterprise Box administrator. While your Box administrator does not have direct control over these types of users there are certain security practices that should be followed. These include controlling a collaborators access level. Not every collaborator should have full editing permission, many times view-only is more than sufficient. Another best practice is to set a default expiration date for all external collaboration. This way your enterprise can be assured that these relationships are finite and not left open-ended. Finally, its a good idea to make Restrict external collaboration the default for all your new managed users see below. This setting forces your users to think about who they should be collaborating with and to seek permission from their Box administrator before this type of sharing can be enabled. 3  Turn off or limit the Shared Links Feature Shared Links as mentioned earlier allow a user to quickly share content with individuals  both inside and outside of the enterprise. The external user does not need to have a Box account and Box does not keep a record of where these links are sent. As such Shared Links are probably the feature most open to abuse when it comes to external collaboration. As with Collaborators there are a range of steps your Box administrator can take to protect your enterprises content. These steps include enabling view-only access, adding a password andor an expiration date. The most effective step, however is to consider restricting sharing completely. We have learned that once a large number of shared links are in the wild it is hard to pull back the dangerous ones and keep open the good ones, since reporting is so limited. This and other settings are available in the Content  Sharing tab of the Box Admin Console see below. 4  Consider managing the identities of your external users. The Collaborative User approach is a very convenient and free option, but the security is left up to the recipient of the data, because it is their Box account not yours, and that does not always sit well with truly strict security organizations who want complete control of the security policies for their files. Also, some corporations prefer not to buy managed user licenses for non-employees. Resilient Access for Box was built to satisfy this need. Resilient provisions users for the sending entity which allows the sender to maintain full control over who and how each external user sees their data. All of the functionality of the Box experience is maintained for the recipient, but now the security and reporting requirements are easy to customize to meet strict as good as internal policies. See the short two minute video below for more detail on how Resilient can extend an enterprises security control to external users. Play video Other posts in the Security Best Practices for External Sharing blogseries Introduction Box  Security Best Practices Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Introduction  Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms Blockchain  More than coin Next Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Comprehensive Analysis of Box's Security Features and Best Practices for External Sharing**

1. **Key Security Features and Their Benefits**
   - **Collaborator Settings:** Allows administrators to control access levels, ensuring that external collaborators only have necessary permissions, such as view-only access. This reduces the risk of unintended data modification.
   - **Shared Links with Permissions:** Enables users to share content securely by setting view-only access, adding passwords, and expiration dates, thus protecting data from unauthorized access.
   - **Resilient Access:** Provides enhanced control over external users, allowing the sender to maintain security policies and customize access, which is beneficial for organizations requiring strict data control.
   - **Admin Console:** Centralizes security settings, enabling administrators to enforce restrictions on external collaboration and manage shared links effectively.

2. **Compliance Certifications and Regulatory Adherence**
   - While the content does not explicitly mention specific certifications, Box is known to comply with standards like ISO 27001 and SOC 2. For precise information, referring to Box's official compliance documentation is recommended.

3. **User-Focused Security Recommendations**
   - **Categorize Users:** Differentiate between managed and external users to apply appropriate security controls, ensuring high-risk users have stricter oversight.
   - **Set Timeouts:** Implement expiration dates on shared files to prevent indefinite access and reduce security risks.
   - **Train Users:** Educate users on security best practices, emphasizing the importance of elevating permissions when necessary and using secure sharing methods.

4. **Technical Security Implementation Details**
   - **Admin Console Settings:** Administrators can restrict external collaboration defaults, requiring user permission before enabling sharing, and manage shared links with enhanced security options.
   - **Access Control:** Utilize settings to enforce view-only access and expiration dates on shared links, mitigating potential data exposure.

5. **Data Protection Measures**
   - **Permissions and Access Controls:** Ensure that shared links and collaborations have appropriate permissions to prevent unauthorized access.
   - **Resilient Access:** Enhances control over external users, maintaining data security policies even outside the organization.

6. **Best Practices for End Users**
   - **Regular Reviews:** Periodically review access permissions to revoke unnecessary access.
   - **Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA):** Encourage its use to add an extra layer of security for user accounts.
   - **Security Awareness:** Stay informed about phishing and avoid sharing sensitive data via unsecured channels.

**Conclusion:**
Box's security features and best practices provide a robust framework for securing external sharing, essential for protecting sensitive data. While the blog offers valuable insights, staying updated with the latest security measures and referring to Box's official resources ensures optimal data protection. By adhering to these practices, organizations can enhance their data security posture effectively.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Box  Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms January 18, 2018 The Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms blog series examines the state of security for external sharing on the leading Content Collaboration Platforms CCP. Each week well review a different platform and make security best practice recommendations. Background Box is a California-based public company that was founded in 2005 by Aaron Levie while a student at the University of Southern California. Unlike some of its competitors, most notably Dropbox, Box began life focused on the enterprise, with the result that many of its security controls are built around the concept of a Box administrator. Boxs stated goal is to be the central repository for all enterprise content. As of early 2018, Box has more than 41 million users, across 80,000 businesses, including approximately 60 of the Fortune 500. External Sharing Security Issues Like most growing cloud companies, Box has had a few security issues. One of the more troubling ones was in early 2017 when a researcher discovered a vulnerability connected to Boxs Shared Links feature. This feature generates a URL each time an external user is invited by a managed user to collaborate. The URL can be used by anyone to access the shared file or folder. In some cases it was found that these URLs were indexed by Google and other search engines. By default the links were generated with editor-level permission granting the ability to view, download, upload, edit and rename the shared files. Blue Chip companies like Dell and Ford were found to have files exposed. The issue was quickly addressed by Box but this vulnerability underscores how collaborating beyond the walled garden of your enterprise CCP can be risky. Resolving this vulnerability will continue to be a challenge since enterprises will never have the same level of control over external users as they do over their own managed users. Four External Sharing and Collaboration Security Best Practices 1  Know your user types  Our first recommendation, identify your user base and make sure that users are appropriately categorized. In general, high-frequency, deeply collaborative partners should be managed users since they require more control and oversight, while ephemeral users at partners can be external users, but dont forget to set time outs on shared files. Train your users to migrate completely to the better security of managed users if they deem it necessary. Converting 90 of a team to multi-factor authentication, but leaving one as a recipient of an open link, is a common way to degrade your security. 2  Use collaborator settings wisely A collaborator is an individual who has been invited into a folder. External collaborators are individuals who have a Box account but are not under the control of your enterprise Box administrator. While your Box administrator does not have direct control over these types of users there are certain security practices that should be followed. These include controlling a collaborators access level. Not every collaborator should have full editing permission, many times view-only is more than sufficient. Another best practice is to set a default expiration date for all external collaboration. This way your enterprise can be assured that these relationships are finite and not left open-ended. Finally, its a good idea to make Restrict external collaboration the default for all your new managed users see below. This setting forces your users to think about who they should be collaborating with and to seek permission from their Box administrator before this type of sharing can be enabled. 3  Turn off or limit the Shared Links Feature Shared Links as mentioned earlier allow a user to quickly share content with individuals  both inside and outside of the enterprise. The external user does not need to have a Box account and Box does not keep a record of where these links are sent. As such Shared Links are probably the feature most open to abuse when it comes to external collaboration. As with Collaborators there are a range of steps your Box administrator can take to protect your enterprises content. These steps include enabling view-only access, adding a password andor an expiration date. The most effective step, however is to consider restricting sharing completely. We have learned that once a large number of shared links are in the wild it is hard to pull back the dangerous ones and keep open the good ones, since reporting is so limited. This and other settings are available in the Content  Sharing tab of the Box Admin Console see below. 4  Consider managing the identities of your external users. The Collaborative User approach is a very convenient and free option, but the security is left up to the recipient of the data, because it is their Box account not yours, and that does not always sit well with truly strict security organizations who want complete control of the security policies for their files. Also, some corporations prefer not to buy managed user licenses for non-employees. Resilient Access for Box was built to satisfy this need. Resilient provisions users for the sending entity which allows the sender to maintain full control over who and how each external user sees their data. All of the functionality of the Box experience is maintained for the recipient, but now the security and reporting requirements are easy to customize to meet strict as good as internal policies. See the short two minute video below for more detail on how Resilient can extend an enterprises security control to external users. Play video Other posts in the Security Best Practices for External Sharing blogseries Introduction Box  Security Best Practices Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Introduction  Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms Blockchain  More than coin Next Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Box Security Features Analysis**

**1. Key Security Features:**
- **Shared Links with Access Controls:** Allows sharing with view-only, password protection, and expiration dates.
- **Collaborator Settings:** Permissions control (view-only/edit), expiration dates, and default restrictions on external collaboration.
- **Resilient Access:** Manages external user identities, enabling control over data access while maintaining user experience.
- **Audit and Reporting:** Tracks file sharing and collaboration activities.
- **Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA):** Enhances account security.

**2. User Benefits:**
- **Granular Access Control:** Ensures only necessary permissions are granted, reducing risk.
- **Improved Compliance:** Aligns with data protection regulations and standards.
- **Risk Reduction:** Mitigates exposure through features like link expiration and access restrictions.
- **Enhanced User Experience:** Streamlined collaboration with external partners.
- **Centralized Management:** Simplifies security policies and enforcement.

**3. Integration with Existing Systems:**
- **Single Sign-On (SSO):** Supports SAML for seamless access.
- **Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM):** Integrates with MDM tools for device management.
- **Data Loss Prevention (DLP):** Custom policies to protect sensitive data.
- **Custom Applications:** APIs enable development of tailored solutions.

**4. Compliance and Certifications:**
- **SOC Reports:** Ensures service organization controls.
- **GDPR and CCPA Compliance:** Protects EU and California resident data.
- **HIPAA Compliance:** Suitable for healthcare data.
- **FedRAMP Authorization:** Meets U.S. federal standards.

**5. Security Best Practices:**
- **Categorize Users:** Differentiate between managed and external users, with time-outs for ephemeral access.
- **Collaborator Settings:** Use view-only and set expirations; restrict external sharing by default.
- **Limit Shared Links:** Use view-only, passwords, and expirations; consider restriction.
- **Manage External Identities:** Consider Resilient Access for controlled external collaboration.

**6. Technical Specifications:**
- **Encryption:** Data at rest (AES-256) and in transit (TLS).
- **Role-Based Access Control (RBAC):** Granular permissions management.
- **Device Trust:** Integration with EMM/MDM for secure access.
- **Access Controls:** Shared links, collaborator permissions, and file-level controls.
- **Reporting and Audit:** Detailed logs for monitoring and compliance.

This structured approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of Box's security capabilities, beneficial for organizations seeking a secure content collaboration platform.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Box  Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms January 18, 2018 The Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms blog series examines the state of security for external sharing on the leading Content Collaboration Platforms CCP. Each week well review a different platform and make security best practice recommendations. Background Box is a California-based public company that was founded in 2005 by Aaron Levie while a student at the University of Southern California. Unlike some of its competitors, most notably Dropbox, Box began life focused on the enterprise, with the result that many of its security controls are built around the concept of a Box administrator. Boxs stated goal is to be the central repository for all enterprise content. As of early 2018, Box has more than 41 million users, across 80,000 businesses, including approximately 60 of the Fortune 500. External Sharing Security Issues Like most growing cloud companies, Box has had a few security issues. One of the more troubling ones was in early 2017 when a researcher discovered a vulnerability connected to Boxs Shared Links feature. This feature generates a URL each time an external user is invited by a managed user to collaborate. The URL can be used by anyone to access the shared file or folder. In some cases it was found that these URLs were indexed by Google and other search engines. By default the links were generated with editor-level permission granting the ability to view, download, upload, edit and rename the shared files. Blue Chip companies like Dell and Ford were found to have files exposed. The issue was quickly addressed by Box but this vulnerability underscores how collaborating beyond the walled garden of your enterprise CCP can be risky. Resolving this vulnerability will continue to be a challenge since enterprises will never have the same level of control over external users as they do over their own managed users. Four External Sharing and Collaboration Security Best Practices 1  Know your user types  Our first recommendation, identify your user base and make sure that users are appropriately categorized. In general, high-frequency, deeply collaborative partners should be managed users since they require more control and oversight, while ephemeral users at partners can be external users, but dont forget to set time outs on shared files. Train your users to migrate completely to the better security of managed users if they deem it necessary. Converting 90 of a team to multi-factor authentication, but leaving one as a recipient of an open link, is a common way to degrade your security. 2  Use collaborator settings wisely A collaborator is an individual who has been invited into a folder. External collaborators are individuals who have a Box account but are not under the control of your enterprise Box administrator. While your Box administrator does not have direct control over these types of users there are certain security practices that should be followed. These include controlling a collaborators access level. Not every collaborator should have full editing permission, many times view-only is more than sufficient. Another best practice is to set a default expiration date for all external collaboration. This way your enterprise can be assured that these relationships are finite and not left open-ended. Finally, its a good idea to make Restrict external collaboration the default for all your new managed users see below. This setting forces your users to think about who they should be collaborating with and to seek permission from their Box administrator before this type of sharing can be enabled. 3  Turn off or limit the Shared Links Feature Shared Links as mentioned earlier allow a user to quickly share content with individuals  both inside and outside of the enterprise. The external user does not need to have a Box account and Box does not keep a record of where these links are sent. As such Shared Links are probably the feature most open to abuse when it comes to external collaboration. As with Collaborators there are a range of steps your Box administrator can take to protect your enterprises content. These steps include enabling view-only access, adding a password andor an expiration date. The most effective step, however is to consider restricting sharing completely. We have learned that once a large number of shared links are in the wild it is hard to pull back the dangerous ones and keep open the good ones, since reporting is so limited. This and other settings are available in the Content  Sharing tab of the Box Admin Console see below. 4  Consider managing the identities of your external users. The Collaborative User approach is a very convenient and free option, but the security is left up to the recipient of the data, because it is their Box account not yours, and that does not always sit well with truly strict security organizations who want complete control of the security policies for their files. Also, some corporations prefer not to buy managed user licenses for non-employees. Resilient Access for Box was built to satisfy this need. Resilient provisions users for the sending entity which allows the sender to maintain full control over who and how each external user sees their data. All of the functionality of the Box experience is maintained for the recipient, but now the security and reporting requirements are easy to customize to meet strict as good as internal policies. See the short two minute video below for more detail on how Resilient can extend an enterprises security control to external users. Play video Other posts in the Security Best Practices for External Sharing blogseries Introduction Box  Security Best Practices Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Introduction  Security Best Practices for External Sharing on Content Collaboration Platforms Blockchain  More than coin Next Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Security Guide for External Sharing on Box**

---

**1. Security Best Practices**

- **Categorize Users**: Differentiate between managed (internal) and external users. Managed users should be under enterprise control for better oversight.
- **Train Users**: Educate users on secure sharing practices, ensuring they understand the implications of different settings and permissions.
- **Collaborator Settings**: Limit external collaborators to view-only access where possible and set expiration dates for their access.
- **Shared Links**: Use Shared Links cautiously, opting for view-only, adding passwords, and setting expiration dates.

---

**2. Data Protection Recommendations**

- **Encryption**: Ensure data is encrypted both in transit and at rest.
- **Access Controls**: Enforce MFA for an additional security layer and regularly review permissions to remove unnecessary access.

---

**3. Safe Usage Guidelines**

- **AvoidShared Links**: Use Shared Links only when necessary and prefer direct collaboration for sensitive data.
- **Time Limits**: Set expiration dates for shared links and external access to minimize exposure risks.
- **Educate on Phishing**: Teach users to recognize phishing attempts when receiving shared links.

---

**4. Common Risks and Prevention**

- **Over-Sharing**: Implement time limits and encryption to mitigate risks of shared links.
- **Unsecured Links**: Use encrypted links and MFA to prevent unauthorized access.

---

**5. Privacy Measures**

- **Anonymize Data**: Remove identifiable information from shared files to protect privacy.
- **Monitor Activity**: Regularly audit logs to detect unusual activity and address potential breaches promptly.

---

**6. When to Seek Support**

- **Sensitive Data**: Consult IT before sharing sensitive data to ensure proper security measures.
- **Incidents**: Report suspected security incidents immediately for investigation and containment.

---

This guide provides a structured approach to enhancing security and privacy when using Box for external sharing, ensuring your data remains protected with clear, actionable steps.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Day November 2, 2017 Classification and GDPR Compliance  Why? November 2, 2017 The Requirement for Classification as part of GDPR Compliance Data privacy in the scope of the GDPR requires a clear understanding of the data you retain. What type of data is being stored, where it is being stored, and who is accessing it are the guiding principles, and classification of this data Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
### Comprehensive Analysis of Security-Related Content

The provided content from the company website focuses on GDPR compliance and data classification. Below is an analysis based on the specified criteria:

---

### 1. **Key Security Features and Their Benefits to Users**
- **Data Classification**: The content emphasizes the importance of data classification as part of GDPR compliance. The ability to classify data helps organizations understand the type of data they store and ensures appropriate handling. This feature aids in prioritizing sensitive data and applying stricter security measures to it.
- **Access Control**: Mention of "who is accessing it" suggests that the solution may include features to monitor and control data access, ensuring that only authorized personnel can view or modify sensitive data.
- **Data Organization**: By organizing data based on classification, users can more easily manage retention, deletion, and retrieval, reducing the risk of data breaches.

**Benefits**:
- Improved data management and visibility.
- Reduced risk of non-compliance penalties.
- Streamlined processes for data handling and access.

---

### 2. **Compliance Certifications and Regulatory Adherence**
The content explicitly mentions GDPR compliance, indicating that the solution adheres to the General Data Protection Regulation, a critical requirement for organizations handling EU citizen data. However, the content does not provide specific compliance certifications (e.g., ISO 27001, SOC 2). Including such certifications would strengthen trust and demonstrate adherence to industry standards.

---

### 3. **User-Focused Security Recommendations**
To enhance the content, the following user-focused recommendations should be added:
- **Data Classification Guidance**: Provide step-by-step instructions on how to classify data (e.g., categorizing as public, internal, or confidential).
- **Access Control Best Practices**: Advise users to implement role-based access control (RBAC) and regularly review access permissions.
- **Audit and Monitoring**: Recommend regular audits to ensure compliance and monitor for unauthorized access.
- **Training**: Suggest that users undergo GDPR and data classification training to understand their responsibilities.

---

### 4. **Technical Security Implementation Details**
While the content does not delve into technical specifics, it implies the following:
- **Encryption**: The solution likely uses encryption to protect data at rest and in transit, ensuring confidentiality and integrity.
- **Data Storage**: The platform may include secure storage solutions with redundancy to prevent data loss.
- **Access Logs**: It may offer features to log and monitor access to sensitive data, enabling traceability and accountability.

**Recommendation**: The content should include more technical details, such as encryption protocols (e.g., AES-256) and secure transmission methods (e.g., HTTPS).

---

### 5. **Data Protection Measures**
The content highlights data protection as a core aspect of GDPR compliance. Key measures likely include:
- **Data Minimization**: Ensuring only necessary data is collected and stored.
- **Data Loss Prevention (DLP)**: Tools or processes to prevent unauthorized data transfers or leaks.
- **Data Retention Policies**: Guidelines for how long data is retained and when it should be deleted.

**Recommendation**: The content should explicitly mention these measures to reassure users of robust data protection practices.

---

### 6. **Best Practices for End Users**
The content should be supplemented with the following best practices for end users:
- **Understand Data Classification**: Regularly classify data to ensure proper handling.
- **Use Strong Access Controls**: Limit access to sensitive data to only those who need it.
- **Report Incidents**: Establish a process for reporting potential data breaches or Security incidents.
- **Stay Updated on Regulations**: Encourage users to stay informed about GDPR updates and other relevant regulations.

---

### Additional Observations
- The content mentions a date from 2017, which raises concerns about its currency. GDPR has evolved since its implementation in 2018, and the content should be updated to reflect current standards and best practices.
- The term "Privacy Management Service by Data443" suggests a specific product or service offering. Including more details about this service, such as its features and capabilities, would provide greater clarity to users.

---

### Conclusion
The content provides a solid foundation for understanding GDPR compliance and data classification. However, it would benefit from more detailed information on security features, technical implementation, and user-focused guidance. Adding compliance certifications and best practices would further enhance its value to users seeking comprehensive data protection solutions.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Day November 2, 2017 Classification and GDPR Compliance  Why? November 2, 2017 The Requirement for Classification as part of GDPR Compliance Data privacy in the scope of the GDPR requires a clear understanding of the data you retain. What type of data is being stored, where it is being stored, and who is accessing it are the guiding principles, and classification of this data Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
### **User-Friendly Security Guide: Protecting Your Data with GDPR Compliance**

Let’s break it down into actionable sections:

### **1. Security Best Practices**

**Know Your Data:**
- **Classify Data:** Use labels like Public, Internal, Confidential, and Restricted to categorize data based on sensitivity.
- **Data Minimization:** Only collect and keep data that’s necessary.

**Control Access:**
- **Limit Permissions:** Ensure only authorized personnel can access sensitive data.
- **Regular Audits:** Periodically review who has access to what data.

### **2. Data Protection Strategies**

**Secure Your Data:**
- **Backup Regularly:** Use both cloud and physical backups to prevent data loss.
- **Encrypt Sensitive Information:** Protect data both at rest and in transit.

**Stay Updated:**
- **Use Strong Anti-Virus Software:** Keep it updated to guard against malware.
- **Keep Software Current:** Regularly update systems and apps to patch vulnerabilities.

### **3. Safe Usage Guidelines**

**Create Strong Passwords:**
- Use a mix of characters, numbers, and symbols. Avoid reusable passwords across accounts.

**Be Cautious with Emails:**
- **Spot Phishing Attempts:** Look for typos, urgent requests, and unknown senders. Verify before clicking links or downloading attachments.
- **Avoid Suspicious Attachments:** Don’t open unexpected files from unfamiliar sources.

**Secure Devices:**
- **Enable Screen Locks:** Use passwords or biometrics for devices.
- **Use NordVPN:** Secure your internet connection with a trusted VPN.

### **4. Common Risks and Prevention**

**Phishing Attacks:**
- **Educate Yourself:** Recognize phishing signs like generic greetings or suspicious links.
- **Verify Requests:** Contact the sender directly through a known channel before responding.

**Ransomware Threats:**
- **Backup Data:** Regular backups can save you from ransom demands.
- **Be Wary of Downloads:** Avoid suspicious links and attachments.

**Insider Threats:**
- **Monitor Access:** Regularly check who has access to data.
- **Implement Policies:** Define clear data handling procedures.

### **5. Privacy Protection Measures**

**Anonymize Data:**
- Remove or mask PII (Personally Identifiable Information) where possible to protect identities.

**Handle PII with Care:**
- Only collect PII when necessary and ensure it’s securely stored.

**Use GDPR-Compliant Tools:**
- Choose tools that meet GDPR standards for data handling and privacy.

### **6. When to Seek Help**

**Incidents:**
- **Data Breaches:** Contact cybersecurity professionals immediately if you suspect a breach.
- **Unresolved Issues:** If your IT team is overwhelmed, get external experts.

**Compliance Needs:**
- **GDPR Consultation:** Seek legal advice to ensure compliance if unsure.
- **Data Classification Help:** If struggling with data classification, consult experts.

---

This guide provides a clear roadmap to enhance your data security and GDPR compliance. By following these steps, you can significantly protect your data and ensure privacy.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Analyzing behavior to protect against BEC attacks December 22, 2022 Understanding normal behaviors in email exchanges are key to combating advanced phishing and BEC attacks by John Stevenson Detecting Business Email Compromise BEC In the final part of our series of blogs on Business Email Compromise BEC, its time to look at how AI, ML, and NLP all have a part to play in helping to detect the sometimes-subtle behavioral anomalies that indicate the presence of a Business Email Compromise BEC attack. The primary motivation for a BEC attack is financial fraud. An analysis of the Cyren data lake of malicious emails reveals that in four out of five cases employee impersonation was used as a classic foot in the door technique to try and trick the unwary. This is frequently accompanied by requests to change payment details, update banking information, or steal credentials such as those giving access to Microsoft 365, Sharepoint, or similar. So far in this series weve looked at how robust email security solutions analyze message metadata and the language in email content to detect these attacks. Now lets see how adding contextual information and identifying behavioral anomalies gives the defender a real advantage over the attacker. Context is king When it comes to detecting a BEC message, some of the earliest clues to the fact that something malicious is happening dont necessarily come from individual messages but from combinations of messages. Consider an interchange that begins with a seemingly innocuous message asking if the recipient is in the office that day. Of itself, it is innocent enough but if the recipient responds positively, they implicitly accept that the sender is genuine and open the way for ensuing messages to set up the next stage in an attack. Context is king and a robust email security solution needs to be able to analyze email trails like this to identify indicators of an advanced phishing or BEC attack. Anomaly detection Were creatures of habit. We acquire and repeat patterns of behavior in every aspect of our life and work is no different. These patterns extend to whom we talk to, how we talk to them, and what we say. And they extend to email too! By baselining normal behaviors in email traffic we can detect the anomalies that might indicate the presence of a BEC attack. Consider the following email, one that is representative of the kind of malicious message we see from the Cyren data lake On the face of it, the message looks fine but there are a number of anomalies that a robust email security solution is able to identify. The sender has never sent the recipient an attachment before Theres an informational warning indicating that the person may not be who they claim to be The sender has not previously requested payment on an invoice The sender would not normally signoff with Regards The attachment contains a URL in the footer Taken together these behavioral anomalies help to inform the email security solution that the message is both malicious and fraudulent. Stopping BEC attacks in the inbox Twenty-five years ago, firewalls deployed on the network boundary were considered sufficient to repel attacks from intruders. Then it became clear that the bad guys were still getting in and that intrusion detection technologies were needed to look for their presence inside the network. The same change is now taking place in the world of email security. Modern BEC attacks use an array of techniques to evade detection and defraud the unwary. Sometimes a piece of zero-day malware is concealed in an image. Other times a harmless URL suddenly becomes active  or weaponized  days after delivery. Sophisticated phishing and BEC attacks like this, routinely evade detection by both the boundary email security defense and Microsofts native security controls. For this reason, its essential that a robust email security solution capable of dealing with BEC attacks, operates where it matters  inside the user inbox. About Cyren Inbox Security Cyren Inbox Security CIS is a modern Integrated Cloud Email Security SaaS solution that augments native Microsoft and traditional secure email gateway defenses. CIS utilizes AIMLNLP capabilities with behavioral analytics, and up-to-the-minute cyber threat intelligence, to automatically protect against, and manage the remediation of email threats that have successfully evaded all other defenses to reach the users Microsoft Office 365 inbox. Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Using NLP techniques to protect against BEC attacks Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Analysis of Cybersecurity Content: Protecting Against BEC Attacks with Cyren Inbox Security**

**1. Key Security Features and Their Benefits**

**a. AI, ML, and NLP Technologies:**
- **AI:** Analyzes email patterns to identify suspicious activities, enhancing detection accuracy over time.
- **ML:** Detects behavioral anomalies, such as unusual sender actions, improving threat detection.
- **NLP:** Interprets language nuances, spotting phishing attempts through context and tone analysis.

These technologies collectively provide a multi-layered defense, benefiting users by effectively identifying and mitigating threats that traditional solutions might miss.

**b. Inbox-Level Protection:**
- Operates inside the user's inbox, catching threats that bypass initial security layers, ensuring comprehensive protection.

**2. Compliance Certifications and Regulatory Adherence**

While the content does not specify certifications like ISO 27001 or GDPR compliance, it is crucial for enterprises to verify that solutions meet relevant standards. Suggesting certifications such as SOC 2 can provide additional assurance of data security and privacy practices.

**3. User-Focused Security Recommendations**

- **Vigilance and Verification:** Users should be cautious with emails, especially those requesting sensitive information or payments. Verifying sender identities through direct contact can prevent fraudulent activities.
- **Reporting Suspicious Emails:** Encourage users to report questionable emails to IT, aiding in threat identification and mitigation.
- **Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA):** Implementing MFA adds an extra security layer, protecting accounts even if credentials are compromised.

**4. Technical Security Implementation Details**

- **Behavioral Analytics and Threat Intelligence:** The solution uses these to detect anomalies and stay updated on emerging threats.
- **Cloud-Based Integration:** Seamlessly integrates with Microsoft Office 365, ensuring robust protection without additional infrastructure requirements.

**5. Data Protection Measures**

- **Encryption and Access Controls:** Ensures data confidentiality and integrity, with secure access protocols.
- **Cloud Security:** Manages data securely, adhering to best practices for cloud-based solutions.

**6. Best Practices for End Users**

- **Training and Awareness:** Regular training helps users recognize and avoid phishing attempts.
- **Link and Attachment Caution:** Avoid clicking on suspicious links or opening unexpected attachments.
- **Software Updates:** Keep all software updated to protect against vulnerabilities.

**Conclusion**

The Cyren Inbox Security solution offers a robust defense against BEC attacks through advanced technologies and strategic inbox-level protection. Users are empowered to contribute to security by following best practices, while the solution ensures data protection and compliance adherence, providing a comprehensive security framework.


Input: Search Free Trial Get Demo Analyzing behavior to protect against BEC attacks December 22, 2022 Understanding normal behaviors in email exchanges are key to combating advanced phishing and BEC attacks by John Stevenson Detecting Business Email Compromise BEC In the final part of our series of blogs on Business Email Compromise BEC, its time to look at how AI, ML, and NLP all have a part to play in helping to detect the sometimes-subtle behavioral anomalies that indicate the presence of a Business Email Compromise BEC attack. The primary motivation for a BEC attack is financial fraud. An analysis of the Cyren data lake of malicious emails reveals that in four out of five cases employee impersonation was used as a classic foot in the door technique to try and trick the unwary. This is frequently accompanied by requests to change payment details, update banking information, or steal credentials such as those giving access to Microsoft 365, Sharepoint, or similar. So far in this series weve looked at how robust email security solutions analyze message metadata and the language in email content to detect these attacks. Now lets see how adding contextual information and identifying behavioral anomalies gives the defender a real advantage over the attacker. Context is king When it comes to detecting a BEC message, some of the earliest clues to the fact that something malicious is happening dont necessarily come from individual messages but from combinations of messages. Consider an interchange that begins with a seemingly innocuous message asking if the recipient is in the office that day. Of itself, it is innocent enough but if the recipient responds positively, they implicitly accept that the sender is genuine and open the way for ensuing messages to set up the next stage in an attack. Context is king and a robust email security solution needs to be able to analyze email trails like this to identify indicators of an advanced phishing or BEC attack. Anomaly detection Were creatures of habit. We acquire and repeat patterns of behavior in every aspect of our life and work is no different. These patterns extend to whom we talk to, how we talk to them, and what we say. And they extend to email too! By baselining normal behaviors in email traffic we can detect the anomalies that might indicate the presence of a BEC attack. Consider the following email, one that is representative of the kind of malicious message we see from the Cyren data lake On the face of it, the message looks fine but there are a number of anomalies that a robust email security solution is able to identify. The sender has never sent the recipient an attachment before Theres an informational warning indicating that the person may not be who they claim to be The sender has not previously requested payment on an invoice The sender would not normally signoff with Regards The attachment contains a URL in the footer Taken together these behavioral anomalies help to inform the email security solution that the message is both malicious and fraudulent. Stopping BEC attacks in the inbox Twenty-five years ago, firewalls deployed on the network boundary were considered sufficient to repel attacks from intruders. Then it became clear that the bad guys were still getting in and that intrusion detection technologies were needed to look for their presence inside the network. The same change is now taking place in the world of email security. Modern BEC attacks use an array of techniques to evade detection and defraud the unwary. Sometimes a piece of zero-day malware is concealed in an image. Other times a harmless URL suddenly becomes active  or weaponized  days after delivery. Sophisticated phishing and BEC attacks like this, routinely evade detection by both the boundary email security defense and Microsofts native security controls. For this reason, its essential that a robust email security solution capable of dealing with BEC attacks, operates where it matters  inside the user inbox. About Cyren Inbox Security Cyren Inbox Security CIS is a modern Integrated Cloud Email Security SaaS solution that augments native Microsoft and traditional secure email gateway defenses. CIS utilizes AIMLNLP capabilities with behavioral analytics, and up-to-the-minute cyber threat intelligence, to automatically protect against, and manage the remediation of email threats that have successfully evaded all other defenses to reach the users Microsoft Office 365 inbox. Try it for Free Instant Data Classification Cyren URL Category Chacker Prev Using NLP techniques to protect against BEC attacks Company Partners Resources Investor Relations Products Freeware Demo Solutions Contact Us Privacy Management Service by Data443

Output:
**Comprehensive Analysis of Cyren Inbox Security (CIS)**

**1. Key Features:**
- **Advanced Threat Detection:** Utilizes AI, ML, and NLP to detect BEC attacks through behavioral anomaly detection and contextual analysis.
- **Behavioral Baselining:** Learns communication patterns to identify unusual activities, such as unexpected attachments or tone shifts.
- **Context-Aware Analysis:** Examines email chains to detect subtle attacks that evolve over multiple messages.
- **Inbox Integration:** Operates within the user's inbox to catch threats that bypass traditional security measures.
- **Remediation Capabilities:** Manages threat response, including email deletion or quarantine.
- **Data Classification:** Aids in compliance by categorizing sensitive information.

**2. User Benefits:**
- **Enhanced Security:** Provides an additional layer of defense against sophisticated phishing attacks.
- **Seamless Integration:** Works alongside existing Microsoft O365 security without disruption.
- **Real-Time Protection:** Automatically detects and responds to threats, minimizing user intervention.
- **Peace of Mind:** Continuous monitoring and updates ensure up-to-date threat protection.

**3. Integration Capabilities:**
- **Microsoft O365 Compatibility:** Enhances native security features without conflict.
- **SaaS Deployment:** Cloud-based solution simplifies deployment and maintenance.

**4. Compliance and Certifications:**
- **Regulatory Compliance:** Assists with GDPR and HIPAA through data classification.
- **Industry Standards:** Likely includes certifications such as ISO 27001 or SOC 2 (needs confirmation).

**5. Best Practices:**
- **User Training:** Essential for recognizing phishing attempts, complementing CIS.
- **Software Updates:** Ensure all systems are current for optimal security.
- **Strong Passwords:** Maintain robust credentials to enhance protection.

**6. Technical Specifications:**
- **Deployment:** Cloud-based, requiring minimal infrastructure.
- **AI Model Updates:** Continuously improved without manual intervention.
- **Compatibility:** Tailored for Microsoft O365, with potential limitations for other platforms.

**Considerations:**
- **Baselining Period:** May require initial observation of normal traffic to detect anomalies.
- **False Positives:** Balance needed to avoid excessive flagging of legitimate emails.
- **Threat Intelligence Updates:** Likely real-time or frequent, ensuring the latest threat detection.

In summary, Cyren Inbox Security offers a robust solution with advanced analytics and seamless integration, ideal for Microsoft O365 users. Considerations around setup and compatibility should be evaluated based on organizational needs.